Can you trust an AI summary? Why every key point comes with evidence

AI summaries are great for skimming, but they sometimes say convincing things that are not in the original. If all you keep is the summary, it is hard to know later whether you can rely on it, and you end up finding the original and reading it from the start again.

Tap a sentence to see the original

Tap any sentence that 1234asdf organized, and the “From the original” panel slides up. It shows the passage of the original that the sentence came from, along with the time the original was collected. There is no button on every line, so the reading screen stays clean; open the evidence only when you want it.

Not enough evidence, no result

Notes without enough evidence in the original are not shown as a result. Instead, the app says "Could not create a summary with enough source evidence." and keeps what you captured.

Partial sources are labeled

Some sites need a sign-in or only show part of an article. In that case, only the part that was collected is organized, and it is marked "Only part of the source was collected." It is not covered up with a blank screen or a plausible-looking summary.

The original, the AI notes and your notes stay apart

What was copied from the original, what the AI organized and what you wrote yourself are shown separately. Anything you edit is marked "Edited by me" and stays as it is even if the article is organized again.

If you are using it for an important decision, tap the sentence and check the evidence once more. You can always open the original article from the Sources tab.